Pick Seedance 2.0 if…
You want music videos, reference-driven production, or brand campaigns.
Pick Luma Ray 3 if…
You want cinematic establishing shots, B-roll, or 3D product viz.
Specifications
Maker
ByteDance
Luma AI
Source Type
Closed Source
Closed Source
License
Commercial (paid tiers)
Commercial (subscription)
Architecture
Unified AV Joint Gen
3D-aware DiT
Parameters
Undisclosed
Undisclosed
Max Resolution
1080p
4K (HDR EXR)
Max Duration
10-15s
5-9s
FPS
24
24
Native Audio
Yes
No
ComfyUI Support
No
No
Fine-tunable
No
No
Min VRAM
Cloud only
Cloud only
Cost / Second
$0.14
~$0.50-1.00
Inputs
T2V, I2V, Multi-modal (12 files)
T2V, I2V
On Floyo
No
No
Strengths & Trade-offs
Seedance 2.0
Strengths
- +12-file multimodal input
- +camera replication
- +@ mention system
- +8+ language lip-sync
Trade-offs
- -No photorealistic face uploads
- -newer platform
- -limited integrations
Best For
- →Music videos
- →reference-driven production
- →brand campaigns
Luma Ray 3
Strengths
- +Native HDR EXR (first)
- +superior 3D spatial depth
- +Ray 2 Flash 20x faster
- +loop function
- +NL editing
Trade-offs
- -Short clips
- -most expensive
- -no audio
- -limited style range
Best For
- →Cinematic establishing shots
- →B-roll
- →3D product viz
- →architecture